Passing Q-in-Q
- keefe007
- Experienced Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Passing Q-in-Q
Has anyone tried passing q-in-q(double tagged) frames through a Netonix switch? We replaced another switch with a Netonix and now it seems that double-tagged frames wont pass.
-
mike99 - Associate
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:53 am
- Location: Quebec, Canada
- Has thanked: 95 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Passing Q-in-Q
Look at road map, QinQ is suppose to be introduced in current dev firmware.
-
adairw - Associate
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:47 pm
- Location: Amarillo, TX
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Passing Q-in-Q
I said this on the wispa list already, but shouldn't it pass the traffic even if it can't deal with it, so long as the mtu is big enough?
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: Passing Q-in-Q
I will discuss this with Eric
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1608 times
- Been thanked: 1325 times
Re: Passing Q-in-Q
So I talked Eric into making me a v1.2.1 today that will allow double tagged frames so it will behave like the ToughSwitch in this situation and just pass the frames and not filter them.
Who wants to test it for me and I will email you a copy.
v1.3.0 will support QinQ which is what Eric was working on before I disturbed him.
Some other neat features of v1.3.0
Radius Authentication with fall back to static credentials
Fix Port(s) Mirror to IP
Last known IP in MAC table
Change VLAN Trunk Port (allow all VLANs) to an allowed VLANs list
Add ignore logging for IP monitoring software under Device/Config Tab
QinQ VLANs
IGMP Snooping
QOS
IPERF
Option to require password on console
Add optional second NTP source
Who wants to test it for me and I will email you a copy.
v1.3.0 will support QinQ which is what Eric was working on before I disturbed him.
Some other neat features of v1.3.0
Radius Authentication with fall back to static credentials
Fix Port(s) Mirror to IP
Last known IP in MAC table
Change VLAN Trunk Port (allow all VLANs) to an allowed VLANs list
Add ignore logging for IP monitoring software under Device/Config Tab
QinQ VLANs
IGMP Snooping
QOS
IPERF
Option to require password on console
Add optional second NTP source
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
- keefe007
- Experienced Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Passing Q-in-Q
What did this change do exactly?
Adam is right, changing the MTU from 1518 to 1522 allowed Q-in-Q frames to be passed without firmware 1.2.1.
Keefe
Adam is right, changing the MTU from 1518 to 1522 allowed Q-in-Q frames to be passed without firmware 1.2.1.
Keefe
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests