mhoppes, I'm going to argue that you can't call your network flat if you are proxying arp, just for the sake of argument you know lol.
and maybe I was a bit aggressive with 'can't', but throughput collapses and arp storms cause intermittent issues.
edgemax @pops
-
rebelwireless - Experienced Member
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:46 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
-
rebelwireless - Experienced Member
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:46 pm
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
Re: edgemax @pops
so anyway lol, edgemax at pops has potential but is lacking a few key technologies to handle fast convergence for redundant setups. got it.
-
sirhc - Employee
- Posts: 7437
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
- Location: Lancaster, PA
- Has thanked: 1613 times
- Been thanked: 1328 times
Re: edgemax @pops
WOW, this thread exploded into a deep discussion fast!
I think this is the fastest growing thread I have seen here!
I think this is the fastest growing thread I have seen here!
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.
Re: edgemax @pops
Brutal honesty, I love it. This type of discussion is soooooo educational!
I love the back and forth, good and/bad with both sides making points.
Thanks
I love the back and forth, good and/bad with both sides making points.
Thanks
-
jjonsson - Associate
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 12:30 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Has thanked: 37 times
- Been thanked: 65 times
Re: edgemax @pops
I'm using EdgeMax routers and OSPF, works great. For me it's not if it takes >50 ms to fail over, more that it actually fails over.
What I like about the EdgeRouter is the PoE model I was one of the ideas behind. I use at small sites, powering both backbone links (2) and 3 AP's with sectors (120 degree).
I would really like a stronger version (more powerful CPU) of the EdgeRouter Lite and PoE. One that could run the FQ_Codel setup and not have it limited to 60-70 Mbps per EdgeRouter Lite/PoE.
If it could run 200 - 300 Mbps per port would be great...
For larger sites my plan is to use WS-8 and EdgeRouter Lite...
What I like about the EdgeRouter is the PoE model I was one of the ideas behind. I use at small sites, powering both backbone links (2) and 3 AP's with sectors (120 degree).
I would really like a stronger version (more powerful CPU) of the EdgeRouter Lite and PoE. One that could run the FQ_Codel setup and not have it limited to 60-70 Mbps per EdgeRouter Lite/PoE.
If it could run 200 - 300 Mbps per port would be great...
For larger sites my plan is to use WS-8 and EdgeRouter Lite...
-
WisTech - Associate
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 3:57 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Re: edgemax @pops
Have you played with any policing ingress limiting? It worked surprisingly well and latency/jitter was similar to fq_codel and could limit just under 200Mbps before the cpu was pegged.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest