WS-8-250A Early Impressions
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:34 pm
Hope everyone had a Happy Thanksgiving!
Mine was made even better by being fortunate enough to have Chris send me out an engineering sample of the 8-Port version of the WISP Switch. I have had a ToughSwitch Pro in a 14X12X7 enclosure for about a year and things got really tight inside when I added two AirFiber 24 links and the associated power cords, power injectors and patch cables.
Well, I am happy to report this particular box is now MUCH cleaner. Dropped the WISP Switch in without a hitch late yesterday evening and things have been running great since. As I mentioned, this unit is powering two different AirFiber24 links and is chugging right along- its so nice to be able to see power consumption per port. The form factor is very close to the ToughSwitch Pro so any of you that are planning on installing one in cramped quarters like me where you already have a ToughSwitch, can rest easy. In fact, while the WISP switch is slightly wider, the chassis design I had features the power connector on the same side as the Ethernet ports, so the amount of effective space it requires is less.
Additionally, the ToughSwitch it replaced would get very hot at times during the summer so we are feeling good about having a high quality fan to actively cool the unit. Being able to keep an eye on the temperature remotely through the interface is also a big plus over the ToughSwitch.
Well done! We have six of the WISP Switches deployed throughout our network and couldn't be more pleased. Very much looking forward to replacing the last of our ToughSwitches!
On a semi-related topic, which maybe should be a separate post:
Glad to hear the DC Powered units are not too far away. We have a number of relay sites on the roofs of several residential customers with homes on top of strategic hills where we currently feed ToughSwitch 5s in combination with Tycon high power Ethernet Power Injectors/Battery Chargers. We hope the DC powered WISP Switches will allow us to achieve something similar- one CAT 5e/6 line running from inside the subscriber home to an outdoor enclosure with a charger fed by POE (and a small solar panel) that maintains a small battery bank and powers the switch, which in turn, powers the radios. Allows for very clean installs and some really flexible deployments. Haven't done one of these to power an AirFiber yet... is it feasible with one POE line from the inside to push enough juice to power the DC Powered WISP Switch, an AirFiber, and four or five Rockets? It sounds like you are planning on doing something similar with the Tower Switch, but that would obviously be overkill and not a good fit for this application.
If anyone can do it, it would be you and with what we have seen from the WISP Switches so far, we think this will be a killer combination. Please don't forget to give us a couple of voltage monitoring options. Being able to monitor the line voltage coming from the POE line as well as the battery bank voltage on the WISP Switch would be perfect. Then we would know if we had a problem with the power source and be able to respond proactively before the small battery bank was depleted.
Mine was made even better by being fortunate enough to have Chris send me out an engineering sample of the 8-Port version of the WISP Switch. I have had a ToughSwitch Pro in a 14X12X7 enclosure for about a year and things got really tight inside when I added two AirFiber 24 links and the associated power cords, power injectors and patch cables.
Well, I am happy to report this particular box is now MUCH cleaner. Dropped the WISP Switch in without a hitch late yesterday evening and things have been running great since. As I mentioned, this unit is powering two different AirFiber24 links and is chugging right along- its so nice to be able to see power consumption per port. The form factor is very close to the ToughSwitch Pro so any of you that are planning on installing one in cramped quarters like me where you already have a ToughSwitch, can rest easy. In fact, while the WISP switch is slightly wider, the chassis design I had features the power connector on the same side as the Ethernet ports, so the amount of effective space it requires is less.
Additionally, the ToughSwitch it replaced would get very hot at times during the summer so we are feeling good about having a high quality fan to actively cool the unit. Being able to keep an eye on the temperature remotely through the interface is also a big plus over the ToughSwitch.
Well done! We have six of the WISP Switches deployed throughout our network and couldn't be more pleased. Very much looking forward to replacing the last of our ToughSwitches!
On a semi-related topic, which maybe should be a separate post:
Glad to hear the DC Powered units are not too far away. We have a number of relay sites on the roofs of several residential customers with homes on top of strategic hills where we currently feed ToughSwitch 5s in combination with Tycon high power Ethernet Power Injectors/Battery Chargers. We hope the DC powered WISP Switches will allow us to achieve something similar- one CAT 5e/6 line running from inside the subscriber home to an outdoor enclosure with a charger fed by POE (and a small solar panel) that maintains a small battery bank and powers the switch, which in turn, powers the radios. Allows for very clean installs and some really flexible deployments. Haven't done one of these to power an AirFiber yet... is it feasible with one POE line from the inside to push enough juice to power the DC Powered WISP Switch, an AirFiber, and four or five Rockets? It sounds like you are planning on doing something similar with the Tower Switch, but that would obviously be overkill and not a good fit for this application.
If anyone can do it, it would be you and with what we have seen from the WISP Switches so far, we think this will be a killer combination. Please don't forget to give us a couple of voltage monitoring options. Being able to monitor the line voltage coming from the POE line as well as the battery bank voltage on the WISP Switch would be perfect. Then we would know if we had a problem with the power source and be able to respond proactively before the small battery bank was depleted.