Port detail Flow Control
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:15 am
First let me say there is NO issue with Netonix Switches and I am aware of that. Any bad data comes from the connected device or network layout etc..
This is to help people (myself included) understand some of the stats on the Port detail.
These images come from an incoming Air Fiber port that feeds the switch. The router is at the other end of the Air Fiber link.
I attached two images. One with flow on and one with flow off. I took screen shots when the RX packets were about the same. As you can see most numbers line up pretty well.
The major differences are:
Flow on had lots of TX pause
Flow off of course had zero
Flow on however had 0 RX drops
Flow off had over 30,000
Difference in TX packet total. With Flow off its about 1/3 of the amount of packets.
My 2 questions are;
The TX packet total being so much less with flow off is that because there is a bunch of retransmissions due to pause frames with flow on?
Which is the better scenario having lots of pause frames or lots of RX drops? Juts what is an RX drop?
Mike
This is to help people (myself included) understand some of the stats on the Port detail.
These images come from an incoming Air Fiber port that feeds the switch. The router is at the other end of the Air Fiber link.
I attached two images. One with flow on and one with flow off. I took screen shots when the RX packets were about the same. As you can see most numbers line up pretty well.
The major differences are:
Flow on had lots of TX pause
Flow off of course had zero
Flow on however had 0 RX drops
Flow off had over 30,000
Difference in TX packet total. With Flow off its about 1/3 of the amount of packets.
My 2 questions are;
The TX packet total being so much less with flow off is that because there is a bunch of retransmissions due to pause frames with flow on?
Which is the better scenario having lots of pause frames or lots of RX drops? Juts what is an RX drop?
Mike