Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

User avatar
sswireless
Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:15 pm
Location: Roswell, NM
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Wed May 04, 2016 9:14 pm

We are in the process of deploying an IP20C link and can confirm that they do in fact work with 48VH PoE and consume about 45 watts when fully online.

User avatar
Dave
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:28 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Wed May 04, 2016 9:17 pm

thanks for the update!

User avatar
gripper
Member
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2015 12:22 pm
Location: Central Vermont, USA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:03 pm

sswireless wrote:We are in the process of deploying an IP20C link and can confirm that they do in fact work with 48VH PoE and consume about 45 watts when fully online.


That's -48V right? Did you have to swap polarities on the pinout? (And how would you do that with power on the data lines?)

User avatar
eugenegrandson
Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:34 pm
Location: NYC
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:42 pm

Still an issue?

User avatar
tma
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:07 pm
Location: Oberursel, Germany
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:15 am

Assuming that a Ceragon IP-50E would have the same PoE pinout as the IP-20C, which has been reported to work in this thread (and in the list), I gave it a shot - and blew the fuses on the 48VH port. As it turns out after reading the Ceragon IP-50E User Manual (see page 865 for CeraOS 11.3), Ceragon expects + on pins 3/4/5/6 and - on 1/2/7/8. That will obviously cause a short if the switch provides 48VH + on 1/2/4/5 and - on 3/6/7/8 ... and so it did.

I never tried with an IP-20C but I'm wondering why it would work with 48VH if Ceragon's AC PoE Injector is the same model for IP-20C and IP-50E ... maybe with 48V instead of 48VH, but the draw would be much more than 0.75A ...

BR/T
--
Thomas Giger

User avatar
wtm
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:17 am
Location: Arizona
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Fri Jan 01, 2021 12:04 am

The second problem you may run into is the actually grounding. -48 should have the Positive "Grounded" to the chassis. +48 should have the Negative "Grounded" to the chassis. Some manufacturers have "Floating" Negative and Positive on their equipment where neither voltage is grounded to the chassis.

You need to do an ohms check on the DC leads and make sure that there is not a physical grounding on one of the voltage leads. Especially if you think that you can re-wire a -48 connection on a POE and hook it up to a +48 supply from another device.

DoctorD
Member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 16, 2023 6:06 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Ceragon IP20c w/ Netonix ?

Tue May 16, 2023 6:48 am

As this thread helped us in figuring out the PoE situation with Ceragon MW's I will resurrect it and add some additional info for anyone that will be in the same situation as we were.

We have IP-20S MW unit which is in the same family as IP-20C. We did not use Netonix switch however we tested it out with PoE injector from Ubiquiti (POE-50-60W) which uses pins 1, 2, 4, 5 (+) and 3, 6, 7, 8 (-) which is basically the same as the switch and it works without issues.

Previous
Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests