MORE IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER: Flow Control and Routing

User avatar
mhoppes
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 664
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:14 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: MORE IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER: Flow Control and Routing

Thu Dec 31, 2015 1:56 pm

Without flow control - on a flat network - performance is terrible.

User avatar
rebelwireless
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:46 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: MORE IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER: Flow Control and Routing

Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:23 am

flow control anytime an interface can transmit at a higher rate than the receiving end can receive (usually wireless, like an AF5X pushing 'only' 400Mbps on a gigabit port. That transmitting gigabit port needs flow control.

Anyway, this is one reason I prefer to route everything. I know routing adds a bit of latency, and you are filling buffers, and buffer bloat, blah blah blah, but those buffers can help keep the sanity and hide or eliminate most of the waits on a mixed speed switch.

I haven't run into this too much on the wISP side as we don't push gigs out at this point, but I've had to resolve this is some high capacity enterprise networks that were planned poorly and/or had admins that just thought you plugged switches in and there was no need for experts. Funny how a VM cluster I/O collapses from switch induced waits having 10GB iSCSI storage and 1G VMs.

Previous
Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests