Water Tower leasing/installs
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:15 am
I was going to post this on that other forum.. but I know sirhc is on a lot of water towers so maybe you can chime in too?
I serve a dense area in a small footprint, and I finally have the city ready to work with me getting on the water tower, the problem is, "they/the city manager/attorney" think the spot is worth $1,200 to $3,000 a month. (FYI the city is small, we only have 1 water tower, pop around 10k)
Sprint and Nextel were both on the water tower separately, but they have since merged and left the upper mounts empty. So there is a full cell mount open, with nobody using it, they even have a nice big building that is vacant.
ATT/US Cellular/Verizon and Sprint already have towers in this city, I do not see anyone else coming in to pay that price. (T-mobile maybe? doubt it)
After months and months of me pestering them, they finally got back to me today with some better news. They still want $1,200/m to lock in a secure lease.. BUT...
They will lease space to me at a discounted rate ($300-$600/m), as currently it is empty, and any money is better than no money. The only terms they state is that at some point if a big player comes in and offers them what they are asking ($1,200 or more) I will be forced to vacate the water tower.
I asked if that were to happen, before I vacate, would I then have the option to commit to their asking price. His response was, "Yes, You would have the option to match their offer". aka they start the bidding war, and I get forced to bid against a large carrier?!
Thoughts? I had a few ideas.
I really want the water tower, their discounted rate would allow me to get on now, and grow my coverage area, get that tower operating in the $green. Maybe after a year, or two, I could go back to them, and cave in to their asking price, or close to it, in order to secure my place so I can sleep at night and not worry about getting the boot? But, do I really want to pay $1,200/m? or even $1k/m? Maybe in two years, if they see that nobody has inquired about it, they would accept a reasonable offer from me, to lock in my price and remove the language about me having to vacate to a higher offer..
Or, do I just roll the dice, and take the cheap rate as long as I can. I personally doubt nobody else will come in and offer a high price for it, but, what do i know.. It has been only half leased for about a year now, with nobody else asking besides me.
I serve a dense area in a small footprint, and I finally have the city ready to work with me getting on the water tower, the problem is, "they/the city manager/attorney" think the spot is worth $1,200 to $3,000 a month. (FYI the city is small, we only have 1 water tower, pop around 10k)
Sprint and Nextel were both on the water tower separately, but they have since merged and left the upper mounts empty. So there is a full cell mount open, with nobody using it, they even have a nice big building that is vacant.
ATT/US Cellular/Verizon and Sprint already have towers in this city, I do not see anyone else coming in to pay that price. (T-mobile maybe? doubt it)
After months and months of me pestering them, they finally got back to me today with some better news. They still want $1,200/m to lock in a secure lease.. BUT...
They will lease space to me at a discounted rate ($300-$600/m), as currently it is empty, and any money is better than no money. The only terms they state is that at some point if a big player comes in and offers them what they are asking ($1,200 or more) I will be forced to vacate the water tower.
I asked if that were to happen, before I vacate, would I then have the option to commit to their asking price. His response was, "Yes, You would have the option to match their offer". aka they start the bidding war, and I get forced to bid against a large carrier?!
Thoughts? I had a few ideas.
I really want the water tower, their discounted rate would allow me to get on now, and grow my coverage area, get that tower operating in the $green. Maybe after a year, or two, I could go back to them, and cave in to their asking price, or close to it, in order to secure my place so I can sleep at night and not worry about getting the boot? But, do I really want to pay $1,200/m? or even $1k/m? Maybe in two years, if they see that nobody has inquired about it, they would accept a reasonable offer from me, to lock in my price and remove the language about me having to vacate to a higher offer..
Or, do I just roll the dice, and take the cheap rate as long as I can. I personally doubt nobody else will come in and offer a high price for it, but, what do i know.. It has been only half leased for about a year now, with nobody else asking besides me.