Request Feedback v1.1.0 - PLEASE

DOWNLOAD THE LATEST FIRMWARE HERE
User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7490
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1643 times
Been thanked: 1336 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:12 pm

LRL wrote:If I downgrade back to 1.0.10 from1.1.0rc19 is there any expected issues?


No but I would not do this, v1.1.0rc19 is better!
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7490
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1643 times
Been thanked: 1336 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:15 pm

adairw wrote:
josh wrote:There is a bug in Chrome/Firefox with selecting POE on Port 1. I'm trying to replicate it. I can make it go away by refreshing the page. It's frickin annoying :P

What exactly is the bug? I just logged in to two switches and they both do the same thing. They are 48VH right now, and I can't select anything but off. Same thing for ports 2, 3 & 4 though.
If the ports are off already I can of course select whatever.


That is the way it is supposed to work, if you already have a link on the port with no POE or a specific POE it will not allow you to select another POE option only OFF.

This is to prevent the user from accidentally applying the wrong voltage to a port that already has a link.

Why would you want to apply any other voltage to a port that already has a link?
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
mhoppes
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:14 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:33 pm

Normally I agree with this, but I have run into one situation where I want to apply PoE.. though I still go with the current behavior is the best.

Sometimes working on a very full switch I only have one port left, so I plug my laptop in... then want to turn PoE on on that port. PoE at 24 volts does not hurt my laptop port....

But, the current behavior I agree is the best way for it to operate.

User avatar
wayneorack
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 12:16 pm
Location: San Angelo, TX
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:48 pm

mhoppes wrote:... I only have one port left, so I plug my laptop in... then want to turn PoE on on that port. PoE at 24 volts does not hurt my laptop port....


You are not ever allowed to use my laptop!

User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7490
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1643 times
Been thanked: 1336 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:11 pm

mhoppes wrote:Normally I agree with this, but I have run into one situation where I want to apply PoE.. though I still go with the current behavior is the best.

Sometimes working on a very full switch I only have one port left, so I plug my laptop in... then want to turn PoE on on that port. PoE at 24 volts does not hurt my laptop port....

But, the current behavior I agree is the best way for it to operate.


This is why there is a CONSOLE port.

I am beginning to understand why UBNT did not put in a CONSOLE port because "most" of you guys do not use it even though you all wanted one!!!!
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
mhoppes
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 665
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:14 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:56 pm

No no. I want it. It's just easier to flip the gui :). But console is a must for professional telecom gear.

User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7490
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1643 times
Been thanked: 1336 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:07 pm

mhoppes wrote:No no. I want it. It's just easier to flip the gui :). But console is a must for professional telecom gear.


I agree the UI is easier but do you guys really want us to remove a safety mechanism that helps prevent you from accidentally applying voltage or the wrong voltage to a port by mistake and damaging the device?

Console in and turn POE OFF then unplug device then plug in with your laptop.
When done plug device back in then console in and apply POE to the port.
Remember we do not want you plugging and unplugging LIVE POE devices!!!!
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

User avatar
wayneorack
Experienced Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 12:16 pm
Location: San Angelo, TX
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 & rc19 - PLEASE

Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:39 pm

Buy a switch with more ports!

User avatar
lligetfa
Associate
Associate
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 12:12 pm
Location: Fort Frances Ont. Canada
Has thanked: 307 times
Been thanked: 381 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 - PLEASE

Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:15 am

sirhc wrote:
lligetfa wrote:
tfadgen wrote:Problems: NTP -- switch shows correct Zone time in status tab GMT time in log file
This is common practice with large organizations spanning several TZs that collect logs to a central syslog server.


We have fixed this in the next rc version that should be released late today

1.1.0 golden still shows GMT in log file.

User avatar
sirhc
Employee
Employee
 
Posts: 7490
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:48 pm
Location: Lancaster, PA
Has thanked: 1643 times
Been thanked: 1336 times

Re: Request Feedback v1.1.0rc18 - PLEASE

Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:21 am

lligetfa wrote:1.1.0 golden still shows GMT in log file.


FIXES
- Added 64 bit SNMP support, SNMP was only 32 bit
- Fixed time zones (timezone may need to be reset in configuration)


Did you reset time zone in Device/Configuration Tab?

Hopping mhoppes confirms 64 bit SNMP works.
Support is handled on the Forums not in Emails and PMs.
Before you ask a question use the Search function to see it has been answered before.
To do an Advanced Search click the magnifying glass in the Search Box.
To upload pictures click the Upload attachment link below the BLUE SUBMIT BUTTON.

PreviousNext
Return to Hardware and software issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests